SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Bom) 791

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
Sandeep K Shinde, J.
Sagar Laxman Sonawane - Appellant
Versus
State Of Maharashtra - Respondent
Bail Application No. 2650 of 2019
Decided On : 26-02-2021

Advocates appeared:
Tanvir Nizam, Advocate, Premlal Krishnan, Advocate, Mariam Nizam, Advocate, Prestov Dias, Advocate, Pan India Legal Services, Advocate, S.R. Agarkar, Advocate, S.B. Bhosle, Advocate

The main legal point established in the judgment is the consideration of material evidence, the admissibility of statements made by co-accused, and the interpretation of the MCOC Act in granting bail.

Headnote:

Bail - Criminal Law - The court granted bail to the applicant in connection with a case involving offences under the Indian Penal Code and the Maharashtra Control of Organised Crimes Act. The court considered the applicant's alleged complicity in organized crime and the retracted confession of a co-accused in reaching its decision to grant bail.

Fact of the Case:

The applicant sought bail in connection with a case involving offences under the Indian Penal Code and the Maharashtra Control of Organised Crimes Act. The prosecution moved an application seeking cancellation of bail, alleging the applicant's complicity in organized crime.

Finding of the Court:

The court considered the applicant's arraignment in multiple offences and his alleged membership in a crime syndicate. It also took into account the retracted confession of a co-accused and the lack of material evidence to establish the applicant's complicity in the crimes. The court found that the rigors of the MCOC Act would not hinder the applicant's release on bail.

Issues: The issues involved the applicant's alleged involvement in organized crime, the admissibility of the co-accused's statements, and the impact of the retracted confession on the applicant's culpability.

Ratio Decidendi: The court's decision was influenced by the lack of material evidence to establish the applicant's complicity in the crimes, the prohibition of proof under Section 25 of the Evidence Act, and the interpretation of Clause (b) of Section 23(4) of the MCOC Act.

Final Decision: The court granted bail to the applicant and imposed conditions for his release, emphasizing that the observations made should not influence the trial in other proceedings.

JUDGMENT

Sandeep K Shinde, J. - Heard learned Counsel for the applicant and learned APP for State.

2. Applicant seeks his enlargement on bail in connection with Crime No. 1121/2018 registered with Tulinj Police Station for the offences punishable under Sections 392, 411, 34 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 3(1)(i), 3(2), 3(4) of the Maharashtra Control of Organised Crimes, Act ("MCOC Act" for short).

3. Prosecution case in brief is, that on report by Shital Ramdas Patil, Crime No.1121/2018 was registered on 19th October, 2018 under Section 392 of the Indian Penal Code against three unknown persons, wherein she alleged that on 29th September 2018, at around 19:00 hrs, while passing through D.Mart, Near Saraswati Building, three motorcycle-borne persons snatched 12gm gold chain, from her neck and fled.

4. Applicant was apprehended on 29th November, 2018; but enlarged on bail on 6th December, 2018.

5. An, application was moved by the prosecution under Section 439(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code on February, 2019 seeking cancellation of bail granted to the applicant vide Criminal Misc. Application No.130/2019 on the ground that, in the course of investigation, applicant's complicity in 'organised crime', individually and/or jointly with motive of gaining undue financial gain for himself as member of Organised Crime Syndicate was revealed and that approval has been granted under Section 23(1)(a) of the Act by the authority vide order dated 5th January, 2019 to prosecute him under Section 3 of the MCOC Act. Thus, the learned Additional Sessions Judge-II, Thane vide order dated 2nd April, 2019 cancelled the bail granted to the applicant.

6. Before adverting to the submission of the learned Counsel for the applicant, in support of the application, it may be stated that,

(i) applicant herein was arraigned as an accused in Crime No.111/2018, 136/2018, 1029/2018, 1055/2018 and Crime No.1107/2018 (five offences) and accused in C.R. No.1121/2018 (subject C.R.) on 28th November, 2018 at one stroke on the disclosure of the co-accused, Akshay Salvi and Akhtar, who were arrested on 27th November, 2018;

(ii) in the aforesaid five offences, Akhtar, is cited to be a Head of the Crime Syndicate, of which the applicant is alleged to be a Member;

(iii) prosecution has also recorded, confession of Akhtar (Head of the Crime Syndicate) on 18th April, 2019; and

(iv) Test Identification Parade was held on 16th April, 2019, in relation to Crime No.1121/2018 only and not in relation to the five crimes, as stated above.

7. The learned Counsel for the applicant would argue that, Akhtar, whose confession has been recorded under Section 18 of the MCOC Act has resiled from Part-III of the confession. Relying on the retracted confession, Counsel would argue, the applicant stood fully absolved, in as much as, there is no other material on record to suggest that, he is a member of Crime Syndicate, headed by Akhtar.

8. Indisputedly, there is no other material, except the statements of co-accused recorded on 27th November, 2018 and retracted confession of Akhtar to indicate applicant's complicity in five crimes and subject crime. Even otherwise, applicant was arraigned in the crime in question and five previous crimes, only on the information disclosed by the co-accused while in custody, proof of which is prohibited under Section 25 of the Evidence Act.

9. In consideration of the facts of the case and for the reasons stated, in my view, rigors of Clause (b) of Section 23(4) of the MCOC Act, would not be a hindrance in releasing the applicant on bail. Hence, the following order :

ORDER

(i) The applicant arrested in Crime No. 1121/2018 registered at Tulinj Police Station, Tal. Vasai, Dist: Palghar shall be released on bail on executing P.R. bond for the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rs. Fifty Thousand only) with one or more sureties in the like sum.

(ii) The applicant shall report to the Investigating Officer twice a month i.e. on second and fourth Monday of each month commencing from

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top