SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Bom) 756

V.M.DESHPANDE
Sant Gajanan Nagri Sahakari – Appellant
Versus
Assistant Provident Fund Commissioner – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Shri N.R.Saboo, for the Appellant / Shri H.N.Verma, for the Respondent.

JUDGMENT

1. On 3.8.2017, notice was issued in this writ petition. The respondent is duly served. This writ petition is filed seeking quashment of order dated 16.6.2017 passed under Section 7B and order dated 22.6.2016 passed under Section 7A of the Employees' Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 (for short, "the Act of 1952") by the Assistant Provident Fund Commissioner, Sub Regional Office, Akola.

2. After hearing learned counsel Shri N.R.Saboo for the petitioner and learned counsel Shri H.N.Verma for the respondent, I am of view that this writ petition can be disposed of at admission stage itself. Rule. Rule is made returnable forthwith. Heard finally by consent of learned counsel for parties.

3. The petitioner is a registered society registered under the provisions of the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act. Undisputedly, the petitioner is authorized to function as banking society. The petitioner is carrying activities of credit cooperative society. According to the petitioner, the society is having six employees on its pay roll and the society is also taking assistance of 15 persons who were appointed as pigmy agents. According to the petitioner, function of th

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top