SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Bom) 775

PUSHPA V.GANEDIWALA
Shriram – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Abhishek S Shukla, Advocate, M.J. Khan, Advocate

JUDGMENT

Pushpa V. Ganediwala, J. - The challenge in this appeal under Section 351 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (hereinafter to be referred as the "Code") is to the judgment dated 30/06/2008 in Misc. Criminal Application No. 135/2008 arose out of the Sessions Trial No. 34/2007 (State Vs. Santosh) by the Adhoc Additional Sessions Judge, Pusad, whereby the appellant was tried summarily and convicted for the offence of 'perjury' under Section 344 of the Code, and is sentenced to suffer simple imprisonment for three months and to pay fine of Rs.200/- (rupees two hundred only), in default of payment of fine, to suffer simple imprisonment for 15 days.

2. Brief facts leading to the present appeal are as under :

i. On 08/03/2007, the appellant lodged a report at the Police Station, Pusad, stating therein that the accused, i.e., his brother, committed murder of deceased Kiran (sister in law of the accused and the appellant) with an 'axe'. Crime No. 58/2007 came to be registered against the accused, and after investigation, the charge sheet came to be filed, and the case was committed to the Sessions Court, Pusad. It was tried as Sessions Trial No. 34/2007, which resulted into acquittal o

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top