SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Bom) 777

M.S.JAWALKAR
Paresh Bandekar – Appellant
Versus
Rajaram D Satardekar And Anr – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
S. Taleigaonkar, Advocate, G. Nagvenkar, Advocate

JUDGMENT

M. S. Jawalkar, J. - The matter is taken up for final disposal at the stage of admission. Inspite of the notice respondent no.1 remained absent.

2. By this petition, the petitioner/complainant challenged the order dated 2.11.2018 allowing the accused/respondent no.1 to cross examine the complainant and the order dated 27.11.2019 passed while dismissing the application for recall at Exh17-D passed by JMFC at Panaji in criminal case no.OA/122/2018/B.

3. Facts of the case is that the accused no.1 had approached the complainant for financial assistance to start his land development project. The complainant being his friend agreed to provide him financial assistance by way of friendly loan and accordingly paid different sum on different dates totalling Rs.45 lakhs for a period of four years.

4. They have also executed loan agreement dated 28.11.2017. The accused in discharge of part of the legal liability issued two cheques for Rs.6 lakhs each. As the cheques were dishonoured the complainant issued statutory notice to the accused dated 23.1.2018. Though the accused received the same, he failed to reply and neglected to comply with the statutory notice and to pay the amount. Therefo

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top