SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Bom) 764

SANDEEP K.SHINDE
Rajendra Nivruti Gaikwad – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Ganesh Gole, Advocate, Ateet Shirodkar, Advocate, Ritesh Ratnam, Advocate, S.R. Agarkar, Advocate

JUDGMENT

Sandeep K Shinde, J. - It is an appeal under Section 374(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 against the conviction recorded under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) read with Section 13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 and sentence of one year rigorous imprisonment, and fine Rs.1,000/-, in default, imprisonment for one month for each offence imposed in Special Case No.1/2007 by the Special Judge, (Anti-Corruption), Thane by judgment and order dated 14th October, 2010.

2. Prosecution case in brief is, that accused no.1 a Traffic Constable and accused no.2 a Police Naik, were to regulate the traffic in Thane City. Alleged, that accused no.1 demanded bribe Rs.50/- from the complainant, for returning driving license, which was taken for alleged violation of traffic rules. Complainant, thus approached the Anti-Corruption Bureau. After drawing a pre-trap panchanama, Complainant and the panch witness, Patange reached the spot. At the relevant time, accused no.1 could not be seen around, but instead Police Naik-accused no.2 was regulating the traffic. Complainant enquired with accused no.2 about accused no.1, whereupon, accused no.2 told him that, accused no.1 had given his li

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top