Back
S.S.SHINDE, M.S.KARNIK
Priyanka Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. factual background of the fir registration. (Para 4 , 19) |
| 2. arguments against the validity of the fir. (Para 5 , 7 , 9 , 10) |
| 3. court's observations on the fir's legitimacy. (Para 16 , 21 , 22 , 37) |
| 4. court's ruling on the applicability of competing firs. (Para 27 , 42) |
| 5. final dismissal of the petition regarding one petitioner. (Para 43) |
JUDGMENT
M.S. Karnik, J. - Rule. Rule is made returnable forthwith. Heard finally with consent.
2. This Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India read with Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (for short 'CrPC) takes an exception to the FIR no. 576 of 2020 registered at Bandra police station, Mumbai for offences punishable under Section 420 , 464, 465, 466, 474, 468, 306, 120B, read with 34 of INDIAN PENAL CODE and Sections 8 (C) , 21, 22A, 29 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (for short' NDPS Act').
3. The Petitioners pray for quashing of the FIR on the following set of facts.
4. It is the case of the Petitioners that they suffered untimely and unfortunate demise of their brother Shri Sushant Singh Rajput on 14/6/2020. Petitioner No.1 is a lawyer. Petitioner No.2 is an ex-cricketer had
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
