SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Bom) 710

A.S.GADKARI
Pune Municipal Corporation – Appellant
Versus
Ramesh Radhakrishna Phondage – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
R.M. Pethe, Advocate, Amit Palkar, Advocate

JUDGMENT

A. S. Gadkari, J. - By the present Petition, the Petitioners have impugned Order dated 19th January, 2005, passed by the learned II Additional Sessions Judge, Pune in Criminal Revision Application No.33 of 2005 thereby, dismissing the said Revision Application on the ground that, the Order impugned therein, dated 3rd December 2004, passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate, First Class, (P.M.C.), Pune issuing process under Sections 167 and 409 read with Section 120 of the Indian Penal Code (for short, "the IPC") against the Petitioners herein, in Regular Criminal Case No.22 of 2004 is an interlocutory Order.

2. Heard Mr. Pethe, learned counsel for the Petitioners. Record indicates that, the Respondent Nos.1 to 4 (Original 3 Shri. Mukari Shetty Algude, Adult, Occupation: Social Worker & Member of Standing Committee, Pune Municipal Corporation, Residing at 336, Old Wadarwadi, Pune - 411 016.3 Shri. Mukari Shetty Algude, Adult, Occupation: Social Worker & Member of Standing Committee, Pune Municipal Corporation, Residing at 336, Old Wadarwadi, Pune - 411 016.Complainant) have been duly served and an Affidavit of Service dated 8 th December, 2005 has been filed by the Petitioner

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top