Back
RAVINDRA V.GHUGE, B.U.DEBADWAR
State of Maharashtra – Appellant
Versus
Vishnu – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. conviction of the accused for pocso offenses. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. details of the victim's disappearance and discovery. (Para 3 , 7 , 8) |
| 3. arguments emphasizing circumstantial evidence. (Para 4 , 5 , 6 , 10) |
| 4. challenge to prosecution circumstantial evidence. (Para 9 , 12 , 13 , 14) |
| 5. court suggests re-evaluation of evidence. (Para 11 , 15 , 19) |
| 6. scrutiny of procedural shortcomings in evidence collection. (Para 16 , 17 , 21 , 24) |
| 7. principles of circumstantial evidence. (Para 18 , 22 , 25) |
| 8. discussion on applicable laws under ipc and pocso. (Para 29 , 30 , 31) |
| 9. requirement for tangible evidence links. (Para 81 , 82) |
| 10. final acquittal of the accused on benefit of the doubt. (Para 106 , 107) |
JUDGMENT
Ravindra V. Ghuge, J. - The accused in Special Case (POCSO) No. 02/2017, Shri. Vishnu Madan Gore, has been convicted for having committed the offence punishable u/s 376-A and Section 302 of the INDIAN PENAL CODE along with Sections 5 and 6 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 (hereinafter referred to as 'POCSO' Act). He has also been held guilty of committing the offence punishable u/s 201, 363 and 364 of the IPC. He has been awarded the sentence of
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
