SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Bom) 649

ROHIT B.DEO
Shivaji – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
R.M.Daga, Advocate, M.K.Pathan, Advocate

JUDGMENT

ROHIT B.DEO,J. - Heard Mr. R.M. Daga, the learned counsel for the applicant and Mr. M.K. Pathan, the learned APP for non- applicant / State.

2. The petitioner, who shall be hereinafter referred to as the accused, is arraigned as accused 5 in the Final Report submitted in Crime 134/2015, for offence punishable under sections 370, 417, 419, 420, 468, 471 read with section 34 of Indian Penal Code and sections 39, 45 and 46 of the Maharashtra Money Lending Act, 2014.

3. The crime is registered on the basis of report dated 2.12.2015 lodged by Santosh Gawali with the Police Station, Dabki Road, Akola. The gist of the report is that informant obtained handloan of Rs. 20,000/- from accused Anand Jadhav. Inability to pay the principal and interest resulted in default. Accused Anand Jadhav resorted to threats and pressure to force the informant to repay the loan. Accused Anand Jadhav suggested that the informant sell his kidney. The informant consented since he was persistently harassed to repay the loan. The informant alleges that he met accused Devendra Shirsat alongwith accused Anand Jadhav and accused Shivaji Koli was contacted. Accused Devendra Shirsat took the informant to a Na

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top