SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Bom) 588

A.S.CHANDURKAR, N.B.SURYAWANSHI
Murlidhar – Appellant
Versus
Pushpa – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Smt. M.N. Hiwase, for the Appellant / Shri R.R. Rathod, for the Respondent.

JUDGMENT

A.S. Chandurkar, J. - All these appeals can be conveniently decided by this common judgment especially in view of the fact that the Family Court by its common judgment dated 26.12.2014 has decided the proceedings together.

2. The facts giving rise to the present proceedings are that the appellant and the respondent were married on 23.06.1989. According to the appellant-Husband, the behaviour of the respondent-Wife was not good and she was not performing her marital duties as required. She used to leave the matrimonial house without informing her husband. It was alleged that the wife used to go to the house of one Gangadhar Dhoble by stating that he was her relative. The wife started maintaining illicit relations with him and this fact was stated by the persons in the vicinity of their house. Further according to the appellant, the character of the wife was not good and he had heard that the people in the locality were talking about his wife having illicit relations with a police constable. On 24.05.1990 when the husband had come home without going for his duty, he noticed that the wife and the said police constable were together at their house. It was further the grievance o

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top