SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Bom) 592

S.V.GANGAPURWALA, SHRIKANT D.KULKARNI
Krushna – Appellant
Versus
Director Of Medical Education – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Mr. Mahesh S. Deshmukh, Advcocate, for the Appellant / Mr. K.N. Lokhande, A.G.P, for the Respondent.

JUDGMENT

Shrikant D. Kulkarni, J. - Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith. With the consent of learned counsel for both the sides, heard finally at admission stage.

2. Feeling aggrieved by the impugned order passed by respondent No.3 / Scheduled Tribe Certificate Scrutiny Committee, Nandurbar Division, Nandurbar (hereinafter referred to as the "committee") thereby invalidating caste claim of the petitioner as "Thakur" Scheduled Tribe, the petitioner has approached this Court by invoking writ jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.

3. The petitioner is studying in junior college. The Principal of the college referred the tribe claim of the petitioner to respondent No.3 / committee for verification of tribe certificate. The petitioner has produced sufficient evidence in the form of school record and birth record of grandparents including documents prior to pre-constitutional era. The vigilance was conducted. The petitioner has filed his say in response to the show cause notice issued by the committee. The petitioner is now exploring possibility to take admission in professional course. The tribe claim of the petitioner came to be invalidated by the impugned order.

4.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top