SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Bom) 594

T.V.NALAWADE, B.U.DEBADWAR
Parigabai – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
A.B. Gaikwad, Advocate, A.V. Deshmukh, Advocate, A.M. Gaikwad, Advocate

JUDGMENT

T. V. Nalawade, J. - The petition is filed for relief of compensation of rupees ten lakh in respect of death of one Ashok Kakde, who died due to electrocution.

2. Both the sides are heard.

3. Petitioner No.1 is the widow of deceased Ashok and Petitioner Nos.2 and 3 are sons of deceased Ashok. The incident took place on 31st July, 2014 in land Gat No.12 owned by Ashok. It is contended that on that day, there was rain and the deceased was working in the field. It is contended that he had gone for starting electric motor and at that time Petitioner No.1 was present in the house, which is situated in the same land. It is contended that supply of electricity was taken from a pole situated near the well for electric pump. It is contended that when Petitioner No.1 heard hue and cry of the deceased, she came out and she saw that the deceased was lying near the well. It is contended that the deceased was shifted to Government Hospital, Vaijapur, but the doctor declared that he was already dead.

4. It is the contentions of the Petitioners that during inquiry made under Section 174 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, statements were recorded, inquest was prepared and postmortem was conduc

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top