SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Bom) 575

A.S.CHANDURKAR, B.SURYAWANSHI
Sau. Asha – Appellant
Versus
Ashok Sitaram Nale – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Shri R.M. Kinkhede, Advocate, for the Appellant / None, for the Respondent.

JUDGMENT

N.B. Suryawanshi, J. - This appeal filed by the appellant-wife under Section 19 of the Family Courts Act, 1984 takes exception to the judgment and decree passed by the learned Family Court in Petition No.C-67/2011, to the extent it awards maintenance from the date of order, which according to the appellant-wife, should have been awarded from the date of the petition.

2. The Appellant-wife filed petition under Section 18 of the Hindu Adoption and Maintenance Act, 1956 against the respondent-husband claiming Rs.2 Lakh per month towards the maintenance for herself and for her son and Rs.3,60,000/- towards educational expenses to son. The learned Family Court allowed the petition by directing the respondent-husband to pay an amount of Rs.50,000/-per month each to the appellant-wife and son from the date of order. The respondent-husband was further directed to pay an amount of Rs.3,60,000/- towards educational expenses of son. The appellant-wife, being aggrieved by the direction to pay the maintenance from the date of order, has filed the present appeal.

3. Though served, the respondent-husband has chosen not to file appearance.

4. The learned Advocate for the appellant-wife submit

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top