SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Bom) 558

M.S.SONAK, BHARATI H.DANGRE
Ramakant Gawas – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Pavithran A V, Advocate, Sagar Dhargalkar, Advocate

JUDGMENT

M. S. Sonak, J. - Heard Mr. Pavithran, the learned Counsel for the Appellant appointed under the Legal Aid Scheme for the Appellant, and Mr. Dhargalkar, the learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

2. This Appeal questions the Judgment and Order dated 25th February 2020, made by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Panaji in Sessions Case No.3/2015, convicting the Appellant for the offences punishable under Sections 498-A, 364, and 302 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) and sentencing him to two years and Life Imprisonment, respectively. The sentences are, naturally, ordered to run concurrently.

3. The case of the Prosecution is that the Appellant (accused) physically and mentally tortured his wife Shevanti making demands for gold and dowry, thereby committing an offence under Section 498-A of the IPC. It is further the case of the Prosecution that Shevanti, along with her three children being unable to bear the physical and mental torture any further, left the matrimonial home and went to reside with her brother/mother. It is further the case of the Prosecution that on 6/10/2014, the accused made several calls to his wife, requiring her to meet him at Sanquelim. Acc

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top