M.S.SONAK, BHARATI H.DANGRE
Ramakant Gawas – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent
JUDGMENT
M. S. Sonak, J. - Heard Mr. Pavithran, the learned Counsel for the Appellant appointed under the Legal Aid Scheme for the Appellant, and Mr. Dhargalkar, the learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.
2. This Appeal questions the Judgment and Order dated 25th February 2020, made by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Panaji in Sessions Case No.3/2015, convicting the Appellant for the offences punishable under Sections 498-A, 364, and 302 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) and sentencing him to two years and Life Imprisonment, respectively. The sentences are, naturally, ordered to run concurrently.
3. The case of the Prosecution is that the Appellant (accused) physically and mentally tortured his wife Shevanti making demands for gold and dowry, thereby committing an offence under Section 498-A of the IPC. It is further the case of the Prosecution that Shevanti, along with her three children being unable to bear the physical and mental torture any further, left the matrimonial home and went to reside with her brother/mother. It is further the case of the Prosecution that on 6/10/2014, the accused made several calls to his wife, requiring her to meet him at Sanquelim. Acc
A. N. Venkatesh and another vs. State of Karnataka
HP Administration vs. Om Prakash
Madhu alais Madhuranatha and another vs. State of Karnataka
Mohd. Zahid vs. State of T. N.
Satish Narankari vs. State of Rajasthan
Sharad Birdhichand Sarda vs. State of Maharashtra
Shivaji Sahabrao Bobade vs. State of Maharashtra
State of Maharashtra vs. Bharat Fakira Dhiwar
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.