B.P.COLABAWALLA
Kishore Punamchand Mashruwala – Appellant
Versus
Harish Punamchand Mashruwala – Respondent
JUDGMENT
1. The above Interim Application has been preferred by the applicants/ defendant Nos.1 to 4 seeking the following reliefs:-
"(a) This Hon'ble Court may be pleased to appoint the Court Receiver of this Hon 'ble Court as a Receiver to take possession of the property being Plot No.250/1 and 250/2, RoadNo.2, GIDC Sachin, Surat, 394 230, under Order 39 Rule 2-4 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908;
(b) this Hon 'ble Court may be pleased to attach all the properties of the plaintiffs, including plot No.250/1 and 250/2, Road No.2, GIDC Sachin, Surat, 394 230, under Order 39 Rule 2-4 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908;
(c) This Hon 'ble Court may be pleased to dismiss the present Suit under Order 39 Rule 11 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908;
(d) This Hon 'ble Court may be pleased to order the plaintiffs to be detained in civil prison for a term not exceeding three months. "
2. According to defendant Nos.1 to 4, the reliefs sought in this application ought to be granted in view of the fact that the plaintiffs have violated the status-quo order passed by this Court on 4th September, 2014 (for short "the 2014 order") in Notice of Motion No.303/2011. For the sake of convenience the 201
Narmada Mai Khadan Kamgar Karigar Sahkari Samiti and Ors. vs. Laxminarayan and Ors. 1998 (1) JLJ 357
Ghulam Ahmad Dar and Ors. vs. Mushtaq Ahmad Shah and Ors. AIR 2006 J&K 91
Bharat Coking Coal Ltd. vs. State of Bihar & Ors. AIR 1988 SC 127
Samsul Hudda & Ors. Vs/ Khayber Properties & Investment Pvt. Ltd. & Ors.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.