SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Bom) 531

PRASANNA B.VARALE, V.G.BISHT
State of Maharashtra – Appellant
Versus
Balu Valu Chaudhari – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
V.B. Konde-Deshmukh, Advocate, Shriram S Kulkarni, Advocate

JUDGMENT

V. G. Bisht, J. - This Appeal is filed by the State challenging the judgment and order of acquittal dated 16th August, 2003 passed in Sessions Case No. 117 of 2002 by learned Sessions Judge, Nashik, for the offence punishable under Sections 302 of the Indian Penal Code (for short "IPC").

2. Briefly stated, the prosecution case is as under:

(a) On 18/04/2002 PW-9 PI Ramesh Nimbaji Patil was attached to Ghoti Police Station. He received a message from Ghoti Rural Hospital regarding admission of Chandrakala (since deceased) having suffered burn injuries. He rushed to Ghoti Rural Hospital and with the help of Medical Officer (PW-5) recorded the statement of of the deceased.

(b) It appears from the statement of the deceased that on 18/04/2002 the deceased along with her husband, namely, Balu Valu Choudhari (accused) and her savat ( a rival wife) Manda were residing at Khambale, Taluka-Igatpuri. At about 10-00 a.m. while the deceased was going to work in the field of her uncle,namely, Pandharinath Choudhary, the accused passed remarkThe deceased asked the accused not to speak wrong things and that since he does not bring the essentials for the use of house whether she should remain

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top