BHARATI DANGRE
Namdeo Tulshiram Mohadkar – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Bharati Dangre, J. - The appellants have filed the present Appeal, being aggrieved by their conviction under the impugned judgment dated 11th February 1998 by the Addl. Sessions Judge, Nashik in Sessions Case No. 6 of 1997, thereby convicting all the three appellants under Section 324 of Indian Penal Code (hereinafter for short 'IPC') and sentencing them to suffer RI for six months and to pay fine of Rs.500/- each, in default to undergo SI for two months. The appellant nos.1 and 2 are also aggrieved by their conviction for the offence punishable under Section 325 of the IPC, and being sentenced to undergo RI for five years and to pay fine of Rs.500/- each, in default to undergo SI for two months.
2 While admitting the Appeal on 26th February 1998. The appellants were ordered to be released on bail and the sentence of Imprisonment came to be suspended till the decision of the Appeal. It is informed that all the Appellants have deposited an amount of fine as ordered and are presently on bail.
3 The appellants came to be charge-sheeted by the Addl. Sessions Judge, Nashik alo
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.