SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Bom) 1484

BHARATI DANGRE
Namdeo Tulshiram Mohadkar – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
M.K. Kocharekar, Advocate, Sachin Gite, Advocate, Y.Y. Dabake, Advocate

JUDGMENT

Bharati Dangre, J. - The appellants have filed the present Appeal, being aggrieved by their conviction under the impugned judgment dated 11th February 1998 by the Addl. Sessions Judge, Nashik in Sessions Case No. 6 of 1997, thereby convicting all the three appellants under Section 324 of Indian Penal Code (hereinafter for short 'IPC') and sentencing them to suffer RI for six months and to pay fine of Rs.500/- each, in default to undergo SI for two months. The appellant nos.1 and 2 are also aggrieved by their conviction for the offence punishable under Section 325 of the IPC, and being sentenced to undergo RI for five years and to pay fine of Rs.500/- each, in default to undergo SI for two months.

2 While admitting the Appeal on 26th February 1998. The appellants were ordered to be released on bail and the sentence of Imprisonment came to be suspended till the decision of the Appeal. It is informed that all the Appellants have deposited an amount of fine as ordered and are presently on bail.

3 The appellants came to be charge-sheeted by the Addl. Sessions Judge, Nashik alo

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top