SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Bom) 1405

RAVINDRA V.GHUGE, S.G.MEHARE
Deelip Suryabhan Peste – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Deelip Suryabhan Peste, Advocate, P.S. Pati, Advocate, N.P. Patil Jamalpurkar, Advocate

JUDGMENT

S.G. Mehare, J. - Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith and heard finally by consent of the parties.

2. The advocate/petitioner approached this Court for seeking directions to set aside the order dated 14.02.2020 passed by the Superintendent (Law), Law and Judiciary Department, Mantralaya Mumbai, in Review Application No.907-2019/Notary/E as well as direction to respondent no.1 to issue a certificate of appointment of a notary public in his favour.

3. The petitioner supports the issues raised in this petition by contending that since 2001 he has been practicing law at Chakur and Latur District Court. The Government of Maharashtra had issued a Gazette Notification dated 18.05.2016 bearing No.251 of 2016 inviting the applications from the eligible candidates for the appointment of the notary public at Chakur, Udgir, Ausa, and Shirur-Anantpal for one post each. In the said notification, it was specifically mentioned that the application should be submitted as per Notary Rules, 1956 particularly, Rule 3 and 4 in Form-2 of the Notaries Rules, 1956. The petitioner has submitted his application through District Judge/ Presiding officer Latur on 15.06.2016. The learned Principal Distr

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top