SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Bom) 1322

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
Ravindra V. Ghuge, S.G. Mehare, JJ.
Shaikh Ainashwa Mohd.habeebuddin - Appellant
Versus
State Of Maharashtra & Ors. - Respondents
Writ Petition No. 7936 of 2020
Decided On : 08-10-2021

Advocates appeared:
V.D.Hon, Advocate, A.V.Hon, Advocate, P.S.Patil, Advocate, K.C.Sant, Advocate, M.D.Narwadkar, Advocate

Admission eligibility and documentation requirements for AYUSH courses based on NEET-UG Exam 2019 and relevant regulations.

Headnote:

Admission - B.H.M.S. Course - NEET-UG Exam 2019 - [NEET-UG Exam 2019, Section 22 of the Act, Rule 4.9, Rule 9.1.5.1] - The court discussed the eligibility criteria for admission to B.H.M.S. Course based on the NEET-UG Exam 2019 and the relevant rules and regulations, emphasizing the importance of minimum qualifying marks and the submission of caste certificate and validity certificate. The court also considered the judgment of the Honble Supreme Court in Union of India Vs. Federation of Self Financed Aayurvedic Colleges, Punjab and others, which highlighted the need to maintain minimum standards of education in AYUSH courses and the implications of admitting students who scored below the qualifying marks.

Fact of the Case:

The petitioner, a student of B.H.M.S. Course, sought admission based on NEET-UG Exam 2019. The college admitted her from the OBC category despite her lower score in the open category. The petitioner contended that she honestly applied from the open category and later acquired a caste certificate.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the college illegally admitted the petitioner from the OBC category without proper documentation and upheld the dismissal of the petition. It left the option open for the petitioner to pursue legal action against the college.

Issues: Admission eligibility based on NEET-UG Exam 2019, validity of admission from OBC category without proper documentation.

Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized the importance of maintaining minimum standards of education in AYUSH courses and the need for strict adherence to admission rules and documentation requirements.

Final Decision: The petition was dismissed, and the petitioner was given the option to pursue legal action against the college.

JUDGMENT

1. We have considered the strenuous submissions of the learned Sr. Advocate for the petitioner and the learned Advocate for respondent Nos.1 to 3 and 5. Though this matter was heard for more than one hour, the learned Advocate for respondent No.4/Management has not appeared before the Court.

2. The petitioner, a student of B.H.M.S. Course, purportedly admitted on 12/10/2019 in the respondent No.4 college, has put forth prayers B, C, D and E as under :-

"B. Issue a writ of certiorari or writ in the nature of certiorari to quash and set aside the communication dated 31/08/2020 of the Director of AYUSH, Maharashtra State, Mumbai to the extent of the petitioner holding that the petitioner is not eligible for admission to B.H.M.S. Course.

C. Issue a writ of mandamus or writ in the nature of mandamus to the respondents to hold and declare that the petitioner is eligible for admission to B.H.M.S. course as she complies with the NEET-UG eligibility criteria applicable to the O.B.C. category student and the petitioner be permitted to pursue the course and appear for the examination of B.H.M.S. Course.

D. Pending the hearing and final disposal of this writ petition grant stay to the operation, implementation and execution of the communication dated 31/08/2020 of the Director of AYUSH, Maharashtra State, Mumbai to the extent of the petitioner only.

E. Pending the hearing and final disposal of this writ petition issue writ, order or directions to the respondent No.3 Maharashtra University of Health Sciences, Nashik to issue hall ticket to the petitioner for B.H.M.S. examination of first year scheduled to be held on 24.11.2020 and the petitioner be permitted to appear for the said examination and to declare her result."

3. The undisputed factors emerging from the record and the submissions of the parties, are as under :-

[a] The NEET-UG Exam 2019 was conducted by respondent No.5 authority.

[b] The petitioner had filled in application Form No.9195062079.

[c] In the said State Common Entrance Application Form, the petitioner has mentioned her choice on reservation as under :-Reservation status of the candidate- OPEN Select Specified Reservation NONE

[d] The minimum marks for the open category were 120.

[e] The minimum marks for the OBC category were 107.

[f] The petitioner scored 113 marks.

[g] The admission to the B.H.M.S. course is based on the marks scored by a candidate in the NEET test.

[h] The petitioner has placed before the Court a receipt bearing No.559 dated 12/10/2019 indicating deposit of Rs.50,000/- as tuition fees. The receipt appears as under :-

IMAGE

[i] A bonafide certificate was issued by the Management dated 14/10/2019 declaring that the petitioner was a student of the said college.

[j] The petitioner acquired a caste certificate on 14/01/2020, which indicates that she belongs to the MUJAWAR caste which is recognized as OTHER BACKWARD CLASS (OBC).

[k] The petitioner received a certificate of validity on 11/11/2020 certifying her caste as belonging to MUJAWAR 339.

[l] The Management wrote a letter to the Director, Directorate of Aayurveda, Mumbai on 31/07/2020 for recognizing the petitioner as a student who had not registered in CET - 2019/2020. She was made to pay a fine of Rs.15,000/-.

[m] On 31/08/2020, the Director AAYUSH addressed respondent No.5, which is the admission regulatory authority, declaring that respondent No.4 college had illegally admitted the petitioner when her NEET score of 113 was less than the minimum score of 120 required for the open category.

[n] The college Management wrote to respondent Nos.2 and 5 on 13/11/2020 that the petitioner was admitted through the Institute/ Management quota. She had applied for admission from the Open Category as she did not have a caste certificate. She was admitted in the quota reserved for the OBC category on the condition that she would submit her caste certificate and validity certificate. She had scored 113 marks and was eligible from the OBC category which required a minimum

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top