JUDGMENT

S.S.SHINDE, J. - Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith and heard with the consent of learned counsel appearing for the parties.

2. On 16.03.2021, order of detention under Section 3(2) of the MPDA Act, was issued by Respondent No. 1- Commissioner of Police, Nagpur City, Nagpur. On 22.06.2021, a representation of the petitioner was sent to the State Government through the Superintendent Yerwada Central Prision, Pune, for expeditious consideration and revocation of the order of detention. On 08.04.2021, the representation of the petitioner was rejected. The petitioner was interviewed by the advisory board at Mumbai through virtual conference. Hence, this writ petition thereby challenging the legal and constitutional validity of the detention order.

3. The Petitioner has incorporated grounds (a) to (e) in the petition, however, learned counsel for the petitioner while arguing the petition confined her arguments to ground (c), (d), (e), (f) and (g). Learned counsel submits that though the detaining authority i.e. Respondent No. 1 has relied upon C.R. No. 351 of 2020, it is to be noted that in the said crime the petitioner was not even present on the spot of incident, it was his s