SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Bom) 1263

SURENDRA P.TAVADE
Mohan – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Rajendra S.Deshmukh, Advocate, Vishal Chauhan, Advocate, R.P.Gaur, Advocate

JUDGMENT

SURENDRA PANDHARINATH TAVADE,J. - Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith. By consent of learned counsel for both the parties, heard finally at admission stage.

2. The revision applicant is challenging the order dated 28.01.2020 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge and Special Judge, Nilanga, District Latur below Exh. 21 in Special Case (ACB) No. 01 of 2019, by which an application filed by the present applicant for his discharge was rejected.

3. The facts giving rise to the present revision summarized as under :

The applicant was elected as a member of village panchyat, Aurad Shahajani, Tq. Nilanga, District Latur in general election held and thereafter he was elected as Up-Sarpanch of village Aurad Shajani. Fulchand Madhavrao Bondge is the employee of the village panchyat. He had given an application to village panchayat, seeking no objection certificate for opening Permit Room and Beer Bar. In view of the said application, the village panchyat had passed a resolution on 14.08.2018 resolving that the permission be granted to said Fulchand for starting Permit Room and Beer Bar. It is further contended that on 21.08.2018, the Head Master of Maharashtra Secondary and

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top