JUDGMENT

G. A. Sanap, J. - The appellants have challenged the identical judgment dated 02.03.2010, passed by the learned single Judge, in Writ Petition No. 2796 of 2006 and Writ Petition No. 5232 of 2006. The appellant in Letters Patent Appeal No. 305 of 2010 is the husband while the appellant in Letters Patent Appeal No. 418 of 2010 is the wife. In the writ petitions they had challenged the judgment dated 12.04.2006 delivered by the learned Presiding Officer of the School Tribunal, Amravati in Appeal No. 23 of 2000 and Appeal No. 22 of 2000, whereby their appeals were dismissed. The learned single Judge dismissed both the writ petitions and confirmed the judgment delivered on 12.04.2006, passed by the learned Presiding Officer of the School Tribunal, Amravati.

2. The brief facts of the case are as follows:

In the appeals before the learned Presiding Officer of the School Tribunal, Amravati the appellants sought the declaration that the communication dated 22.01.2000 shown to have been 'Resignation Letters' addressed to the respondent Nos. 1 and 2 is null and void and consequently, prayed for setting aside the communication dated 29.04.2000 issued by the respondent No.2 in terms of t