RAVINDRA V.GHUGE, S.G.MEHARE
Nitin – Appellant
Versus
Central Bank Of India, Mumbai – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Ravindra V. Ghuge, J. - Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith and heard finally by the consent of the parties.
2. The petitioner has put forth prayer clauses A and B as under :-
"A) That a writ of mandamus or writ in the nature of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction under Article 226 & 227 of the Constitution of India be issued calling for the records and proceedings from the Respondent being an order dated 25.01.2018 and communicated through a letter dated 31.03.2018 marked at Annexure F and examine the legality, validity and propriety thereof and be pleased to quash and/or set aside the same;
B) Issue direction/ order to reconsider the claim of the petitioner for compassionate appointment in accordance with law and as per the scheme in existence."
3. The father of the petitioner, namely, Yohan Paulas Arawade was in employment with the respondent/ Central Bank of India as the Special Assistant at the Kolegaon Branch, District Ahmednagar. He put in 34 years and 02 months in employment when he opted for Voluntary Retirement (VRS) on medical grounds since the Permanent Medical Board of the respondent/ Bank examined him and certified that he was "completely
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.