Based on the provided legal document, here are the key points regarding the case:

Case Details * Court: High Court of Judicature of Bombay Bench at Goa * Judge: M.S. Jawalkar, J. * Parties: Jayshree N Rajebhosale @ Bimabairauji Rane (Appellant) vs. Dildar Murarrao Nimbalkar (Respondent) * Subject: Civil Law - Succession and Inheritance * Key Legislation: Goa Succession, Special Notaries and Inventory Proceeding Act (Sections 15, 247, 395, 451, 52) and Portuguese Civil Procedure Code (Article 1369) (!) (!) (!) (!)

Facts of the Case * The deceased, Babajirao Raujirao Rane, died without a will on 04.01.2011. His widow, Sujata Babajirao Rane, filed an application to be appointed as the head of the family/administrator (!) (!) . * Sujata was appointed and later disclosed collaterals (her sister Jayshree and step-sister Priyavranda) as interested parties in 2014 (!) . * Sujata expired on 13.11.2014 without a will. Her mother, Shailejadevi Murarrao Nimbalkar, applied to be appointed as administrator as the ascendant heir (!) . * Dildar Murarrao Nimbalkar (brother of the deceased widow) filed an application on 28.11.2014 to be impleaded as a legal representative of the deceased widow (!) (!) . * Another party, Baburao Desai, claimed to be an interested party and descendant of the deceased's first wife, challenging the inventory proceedings (!) . * Jayshree Rajebhosale (sister of the original deceased) also applied for appointment as head of the family on 10.07.2015 (!) .

Procedural Irregularities and Arguments * The Trial Court passed an order appointing Dildar Nimbalkar as the head of the family based on his reply to Baburao Desai's application (Exhibit D-49) and dismissal of Jayshree's application (Exhibit D-48) (!) (!) (!) . * The Appellant argued that Dildar was not impleaded as a party before being appointed, violating Section 395 of the Goa Succession Act (!) [