MANGESH S.PATIL
Nana @ Narsing Vishwarasrao Nayak – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Mangesh S Patil, J. - Heard. Rule. The Rule is made returnable forthwith. With the consent of both the sides, the matter is heard finally at the stage of admission.
2. The petitioners are impugning the order whereby the regular bail granted to them under the provision of Section 439 (2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure has been cancelled, post a request put up by the prosecution, to add, in addition to the earlier sections under the Indian Penal Code, the offences punishable under Sections 3 and 4 of the Maharashtra Control of Organized Crime Act, 1999 (hereinafter 'the MCOC Act') after a sanction under Section 21 of the MCOC Act was received.
3. The learned Senior advocate Mr. Deshmukkh would submit that the petitioners were granted a regular bail and in the absence of any supervening circumstance or a breach of terms and conditions subject to which the bail was granted, it could not have been cancelled. He would submit that merely because the provision of the MCOC Act were invoked at a later point of time that would not constitute a supervening circumstance. Liberty ought not have been curtailed in the manner in which it had been done. There are circumstances to indicate t
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.