SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Bom) 1168

R.D.DHANUKA, R.I.CHAGLA
Shital Kumar Patil – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Chetan G Patil, Advocate, N.K. Rajpurohit, Advocate

JUDGMENT

R.D.Dhanuka, J. - Rule. Learned AGP waives service for the respondent nos.1 & 2. No reliefs are claimed against the respondent nos.3 & 4. By consent of petitioner and the respondent nos.1 & 2, both these petitions were heard together and are being disposed of finally by this common order.

2. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner addressed this Court in Writ Petition No.4273 of 2019 and jointly state that the issue involved in both these petitions are identical and thus the order that would be passed in Writ Petition No.4273 of 2019 would apply in Writ Petition No.4275 of 2019 also. Statement is accepted. The petitioner has impugned the order passed by the Education Officer, the respondent no.-2 herein rejecting the proposal submitted by the respondent no.4 for seeking approval to the appointment of the petitioner to the post of a peon. Some of the relevant facts in both these petitions are as under : -

FACTS IN WRIT PETITION NO.4273 of 2019

3. The respondent no.3 is a minority educational institution registered under the provisions of Maharashtra Public Trust Act, 1950. Some time in the year 2017 a vacancy arose in the respondent no.4 school for the post of Peon. The r

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top