SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Bom) 1139

MILIND N.JADHAV
Eknath Nivrutti Hegadkar – Appellant
Versus
Aagatrao Dyanu Ghodake – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Surel S. Shah, Advocate, Prasad Kulkarni, Advocate

JUDGMENT

MILIND N.JADHAV, J. - Heard Mr. Shah, learned counsel appearing for the petitioners and Mr. Kulkarni, learned counsel appearing for the respondents.

2. By the present Writ Petition, the petitioners have prayed for following reliefs:-

"(B) After calling for the records and proceedings from the Court of learned Civil Judge, Junior Division, Madha in respect of the Regular Civil Suit No. 22/2008, this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to examine the legality, validity and / or propriety of the impugned Judgments and Orders dtd. 17/11/2016 passed by the learned Civil Judge, Junior Division, Madha in respect of Regular Civil Suit no.22/2008 below Exhibit 35 and 39;

(c) After examining the legality, validity and / or propriety of the same, this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to quash and set aside the separate impugned Judgment and Orders dtd. 17/11/2016 passed by the learned Civil Judge, Junior Division, Madha and further be pleased to reject the applications below Exh. 35 and 39 preferred in the Regular Civil Suit No. 22/2008."

3. Petitioners are aggrieved by the twin orders both dtd. 17/11/2016 passed by the Civil Judge, Junior Division, Madha in two applications namely Exh. 35 and E

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top