SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Bom) 1143

S.V.GANGAPURWALA, SHRIKANT D.KULKARNI
Bhagauji – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
S.S. Tope, Advocate, A.R. Kale, Advocate, D.G. Nagode, Advocate, N.T. Tribhuwan, Advocate, S.K. Kadam, Advocate, A.B. Dhongade, Advocate, Amol Patale, Advocate, R.B. Bhosale, Advocate, Deepak K Rajput, Advocate

JUDGMENT

Shrikant D. Kulkarni, J. - Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith. With the consent of the learned counsel for both the sides, heard finally at admission stage.

2. This bunch of writ petitions can be disposed of by common judgment and order by looking to the similar facts and question of law involved therein.

3. Factual matrix -

(a) The petitioners are resident of different villages situated in Taluka Jalna and Ambad, District Jalna. They own agricultural lands adjacent to National Highway No. 753H (previously known as State Highway No. 176). According to the petitioners, in their agricultural lands, they have their residential houses, wells, fruit trees, bore-well etc. which are also adjacent to the National Highway No. 753H.

(b) The road in question was a small road earlier and it came to be converted into State Highway without payment of any compensation to the petitioners while expansion of State Highway.

(c) It is the stand of the petitioners that the existing width of the road is about 12 meters. The respondents have recently issued a letter of award and started expansi

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top