SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Bom) 1117

PRASANNA B.VARALE, SURENDRA P.TAVADE
Lata Shivram Anklu – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Aniket Vagal, Advocate, Arfan Sait, Advocate

JUDGMENT

Surendra P. Tavade, J. - The Appellant (original Accused) has preferred this appeal against the judgment and order passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Greater Bombay in Sessions Case No.234/2014 whereby she was convicted of the charge of committing offence punishable under Section 302 of Indian Penal Code (for short "IPC"), and sentenced to suffer imprisonment for life and to pay fine of Rs. 1,000/-, in default, to suffer further simple imprisonment for a period of one month.

2. The case of prosecution, in brief, can be summarized as under:

Bhumya Ramyya Yalmadu - Deceased (hereinafter referred to as the Deceased) was residing in a room at Railway Sankalp Vasahat Mankhurd, Mumbai. He was widower. He came into contact with the Appellant at Cuf Parade. The Appellant was widow. Both of them decided to reside together in the house of the Deceased. The Appellant was addicted of liquor and narcotic drug. Hence, she used to demand money from the Deceased.

3. On 12.12.2013 at about 10.00 a.m. the Deceased and Appellant were in the house of Deceased. The Appellant demanded Rs.600/- from the Deceased, but the Deceased gave only 100/- to her and told her that he would give balance

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top