V.K.JADHAV, SHRIKANT D.KULKARNI
Sayyad Rahim Sayyad Maheboob – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Shrikant D Kulkarni, J. - Heard finally with consent of both the sides.
2. By this application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, the applicants are seeking the following substantive prayers.
"C. The FIR No.24/2020 registered with Police Station, Sirsala, Dist. Beed for the offences punishable U/s. 306, 504, 34 of I.P.C. and U/s. 3(1)(r)(s), 3(2)(v) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 may kindly be quashed, which is at Exhibit "A".
C-1 The Charge sheet filed by the Investigating Officer in Crime No.24/2020 registered with Police Station Sirsala, Dist. Beed for the offences punishable u/sec. 306, 504, 34 of I.P.C. and u/sec. 3(1)(r)(s) and 3(2)(v) of the S.C. & S.T. (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 may kindly be quashed, which is at Exhibit "G".
C-2. The Criminal Case bearing Special Case No.1/2021 (The State of Maharashtra Vs. Sayyad Rahim and Others) pending on the file of Learned Special Judge i.e. Additional Sessions Judge at Majalgaon, Dist. Beed may kindly be quashed."
3. The factual scenario giving rise to this quashing application, in short, is as under:
3(a) Respondent No.2 / first informant lodged F.I.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.