PRASANNA B.VARALE, SURENDRA P.TAVADE
Sanjay Uttam Suryavanshi – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Surendra P. Tavade, J. - Both these appeals are arisen out of the judgment and order passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Malegaon, District- Nasik, in Sessions Case No. 26 of 2009 dated 12th October 2011. Hence, both these appeals are taken together for hearing.
2. Original Accused No. 1 has preferred an appeal bearing No. 1470 of 2011. By the judgment and order passed in Sessions Case No. 26 of 2009, the Appellant (in 1470 of 2011) has been convicted of the offence punishable under Sections 302 of Indian Penal Code (for short "IPC") and sentenced to suffer RI for life and to pay fine of Rs.1,000/- in default of payment, he was directed to undergo RI for two months. He along with Original Accused Nos. 2 to 4 have been also convicted of the offence punishable under Section 498(A) and sentenced to suffer RI for two years each and to pay fine of Rs. 500/- each, in default, all of them have been directed to undergo RI for one month. But Original Accused Nos. 2 to 4 did not prefer an appeal against the said conviction order. The Appellant and other co-accused have been acquitted for the offence punishable under Section 304(B) read with 34 of IPC, similarly Original Accused
C. Chenga Reddy & Ors. V/s. State of A.P
Mafabhai Nagarbhai Raval vs. State of Gujarat
Mulak Raj V/s. State of Haryana
P. Mani V/s. State of Tamil Nadu
Ravindra Pyarelal Bidlan & others V/s. State of Maharashtra
Soma Bhai V/s. State of Gujarat
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.