IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
R.D. Dhanuka, Abhay Ahuja, JJ.
Rushikesh Deepak Chavan & Anr. - Appellants
Versus
State Of Maharashtra & Ors. - Respondents
Writ Petition No. 9864 of 2018
Decided On : 04-12-2021
Caste Validity - Thakur Scheduled Tribe - Article 226 of the Constitution of India - Anand Vs. Committee for Scrutiny and Verification of Tribe Claims and Ors, (2012) 1 SCC 113 - Nikhil s/o Anil Thakur Vs. State of Maharashtra and ors. in Writ Petition No. 11344 of 2019 - [Article 226 of the Constitution of India, Anand Vs. Committee for Scrutiny and Verification of Tribe Claims and Ors, (2012) 1 SCC 113, Nikhil s/o Anil Thakur Vs. State of Maharashtra and ors. in Writ Petition No. 11344 of 2019] - The court discussed the legality and validity of the caste validity certificate for Thakur Scheduled Tribe, emphasizing the probative value of pre-independence documents and the relevance of the affinity test. The court highlighted the importance of considering pre-independence documents and near relatives' caste validity certificates in determining the caste claim, ultimately remanding the matter back to the scrutiny committee for fresh consideration.
Fact of the Case:
The petitioners sought to challenge the legality and validity of the judgment and order passed by the scrutiny committee to issue a caste validity certificate for Thakur Scheduled Tribe. The petitioners claimed to belong to the Thakur Scheduled Tribe based on their genealogical tree and pre-constitutional documents.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the scrutiny committee failed to consider the pre-independence documents and near relatives' caste validity certificates, emphasizing their probative value in determining the caste claim. As a result, the court set aside the previous order and remanded the matter back to the scrutiny committee for fresh consideration.
Issues: The issues revolved around the probative value of pre-independence documents, the relevance of the affinity test, and the scrutiny committee's failure to consider the petitioners' genealogical and pre-constitutional documents in determining their caste claim.
Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized the probative value of pre-independence documents and the relevance of the affinity test in determining the caste claim. It also highlighted the importance of considering near relatives' caste validity certificates in the determination process.
Final Decision: The court set aside the previous order and remanded the matter back to the scrutiny committee for fresh consideration, directing them to decide the claim after considering all the documents and submissions of the parties.
JUDGMENT
1. Rule. Learned AGP waives service on behalf of the respondents no. 1 to 4. Learned advocates waive service on behalf of respondent no.7. Respondent nos. 5 and 6 are Educational Institutes stated to be under the control of respondents no. 3 and 4 and have been duly served. At the request and with consent of the counsel for the parties, rule made returnable forthwith.
2. By this petition, filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, petitioner is seeking to challenge the legality and validity of the common judgment and order dated 29th August 2018 passed by the respondent no. 2-Scrutiny Committee to issue certificate of validity of the petitioners as belonging to Thakur Scheduled Tribe.
3. When this matter was listed on 30th November 2021, Mr. Mendadkar, learned counsel for petitioners invited our attention to the admission notice dated 16th November 2021 for MBA/MMS for the academic year 2021-22 issued by the State Common Entrance Test Cell submitting that the scheduled date for the candidates including petitioners to submit the caste/tribe validity certificate was on or before 8th December 2021 upto 5.00 p.m. Since the said admission notice was issued by the State Common Entrance Test Cell, Maharashtra State, Mumbai, leave was sought and granted to petitioners to implead the State Common Entrance Cell as respondent no.7. Petitioners have carried out the said amendment and today learned counsel representing the State Common Entrance Cell is present before this Court and submits the veracity of the date of 8th December 2021 upto 5.00 p.m. as being the time limit by which the Tribe validity certificate is to be submitted by the candidate.
4. In view thereof, at the request of the counsel for the petitioners and with their consent, we are hearing this petition finally.
5. It is the case of petitioners that they belong to the Thakur Schedule Tribe. Petitioner no.1 was granted admission to the respondent no.5-college in the direct second year of engineering degree course during the academic year 2018-19 under the reserved category and petitioner no.2 was granted admission to the first year of MBA degree course in respondent no.6 college under the said category during the academic year 2017-18.
6. Mr. Mendadkar, learned counsel for petitioners takes us to the genealogical tree as set out on page no. 58 of the petition and submits that the petitioners came from the blood line from common ancestor Ragho Thakur, great- great- grandfather from whom came great grand father Shri Krishna Thakur and whose son was Shri Babu alias Baburao, who was born on 1st January 1911 (as seen from the school records at page 54) who is the great grand father of the petitioners. From Baburao came Narayan, who is grand father of petitioners born on 18th June 1932. From Narayan came Shri Deepak who born on 9th March 1970, who is petitioners father.
7. Mr. Mendadkar submits that the school admission records of Babu Krishna Thakur, Narayan, Deepak which are listed on pages 54 and 55 of the petition being part of the vigilance cell report dated 9th August 2018 clearly indicate that they belong to the Thakur Schedule Tribe. Learned counsel also refers to the observations on page 54 of the vigilance cell report with respect to Babu Krishna Thakur, who is the great grand father of petitioners, Narayan Babulal Chavan, who is the grand father of the petitioners, Mr. Jagannath Babulal Chavan as well as Hiralal Babulal Chavan, cousin grand fathers, Sakhubhai Baburao Chavan and Indubai Baburao Chavan grand mothers and submits that all these documents are pre-constitutional documents in favour of the paternal blood relatives as well as close relatives of the petitioners coming from common blood line and which have been duly verified clearly establish petitioners claim to the Thakur Schedule Tribe, which the scrutiny committee has completely ignored and not applied its mind.
8. Learned counsel submits that in view of law as settled of by the decision of the Ho
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.