Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT GOA
Manish Pitale, J.
Anil Shetgaonkar & Anr. - Appellants
Versus
State, Thr. The Public Prosecutor & Ors. - Respondents
Criminal Writ Petition No. 264 of 2019
Decided On : 26-11-2021
hearing - detailed hearing - The court decided that a detailed hearing is warranted after considering submissions and relevant judgments from both parties.
Fact of the Case:
The court heard the learned Counsel for both parties and decided that a detailed hearing is warranted.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that a detailed hearing is necessary and directed the Respondents to file their submissions and compilation of judgments within two weeks.
Issues:
Ratio Decidendi: The court's decision was based on the need for a detailed hearing and the submissions and relevant judgments provided by the parties.
Final Decision: The case was listed for final disposal on 21.12.2021, and the interim relief granted earlier was to continue to operate.
JUDGMENT
Manish Pitale, J. - In this Petition, after hearing the learned Counsel appearing for the rival parties for sometime, this Court is of the opinion that a detailed hearing is warranted.
2. The learned Counsel appearing for the Petitioners has already placed on record a note giving the chronology of dates and events as also submissions and relevant Judgments have been annexed thereto.
3. The learned Counsel appearing for the Respondents may file their submissions along with compilation of Judgments within a period of two weeks from today.
4. List for final disposal on 21.12.2021.
5. Interim relief granted earlier shall continue to operate.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
