RAVINDRA V.GHUGE
Nasik Merchant’s Co-Op. Bank Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Regional Provident Fund Commissioner- II – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1. By this petition, the petitioner-Bank has put forth prayer clause 13(a) and (b) as under :-
13(b). That pending the hearing and final disposal of this Petition, this Honourable Court be pleased to stay the operation and implementation of the Impugned Orders dated 18.08.2021 and 25.11.2011 passed by respondent Nos.1 and 2 respectively.”
2. I have considered the submissions of the learned Advocate for the petitioner-Bank and the learned standing counsel for the respondent No.1-Provident Fund Authority. An Appeal under Section 7-I of the EPF & MP Act, 1952 bearing CGIT-2/EPFA/Q No.46 of 2021 is pending before the learned
O.G.Bajaj Construction Vs. Assistant Provident Fund Commissioner, Nagpur
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.