BHARATI H.DANGRE
Madhav s/o Rajendra Narhare – Appellant
Versus
Secretary, Banjara Jan-Jagruti Mandal – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1. The three writ petitions are filed by three distinct employees, being aggrieved by the Judgment and Order passed by the School Tribunal, permitting the management to conduct a fresh inquiry, though it set aside their termination and directed reinstatement as well as back wages.
2. Since the facts involved in these three writ petitions fall in same conspectus, the three petitions are argued together and disposed off by this common Judgment.
Heard the learned Counsel Shri. Suresh M. Kulkarni for the petitioner in WP No. 5224/2017, learned Counsel Shri. V. D. Salunke for the petitioner in WP No. 4037/2017, learned Advocate Shri. R. J. Godbole for the petitioner in WP No. 5075/2017, learned Counsel Shri. B. L. Sagar-Killarikar for the School Management in all the petitions and the learned Counsel Shri. V. C. Patil holding for Shri. U. B. Bondar for the Education Officer (Primary), Zilla Parishad, Latur, in Writ Petition No. 5075 of 2017. Since the parties expressed consensus to argue the petitions finally, I deem it appropriate to grant Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith. Heard finally with consent of the parties.
3. The brief background would reveal that the petitioners on
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.