V.K.JADHAV, SANDIPKUMAR C.MORE
Govinda S/o. Dashrath Sonawane – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Sandipkumar C. More, J.
1. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith. By consent of the parties, heard fnally at the stage of admission.
2. In Criminal Writ Petition No. 1363 of 2021 the petitioner is challenging the order dated 27.05.2021 which is common to both the petitioners, and the order dated 12.082021 passed by the Divisional Commissioner, Nashik Division, Nashik in Externment Appeal No. 60/2021. Similarly, in Criminal Writ Petition No. 1364 of 2021 the petitioner therein is challenging the same order dated 27.05.2021 passed by Superintendent of Police, Dhule i.e. respondent No. 3 and also the order dated 12.08.2021 passed in Externment Appeal No. 61/2021 by Divisional Commissioner, Nashik i.e. respondent No. 2.
3. It appears that both the petitioners are real brothers and the notice dated 11.01.2021 mentioning that the petitioners are required to be externed from Dhule, Jalgaon, Nandurbar, Ahmednagar and Nashik districts for the period of two years is issued against them. Further, notices dated 09.03.2021 issued to the petitioners calling their explanation as to why
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.