JUDGMENT :

S.B. Shukre, J.

Heard.

2. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith and heard finally by consent of parties.

3. Although there are several validities existing in the Petitioner’s paternal family, she submitted two validity certificates to the Scrutiny Committee. They were the validities issued to Nilappa Mandleshwar Umbarje on 7 January 2010 and Rutvik Ramchandra Umbarje issued on 10 March 2014 by Committee at Pune.

4. The Scrutiny Committee, however, found that those validities issued earlier were based upon unreliable and untrustworthy school entries of some of the paternal relatives of those holders of the validity. The Scrutiny Committee did acknowledge the fact that the school record containing those entries, which had formed the foundation of the validity certificates issued to Nilappa and Rutvik was of the period prior to 1950, but, as there was a report dated 11 September 2019 of Education Officer of Zilla Parishad Primary School, which holds that the record of the school containing those entries was of doubtful nature, the Scrutiny Committee rejected the said validity certificates. With such reasoning, the Scrutiny Committee concluded that the earlier validities issued to