State of Maharashtra, Through its District Collector vs Bhimdeo s/o Rattu Rathod

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2022 Supreme(Bom) 537

SHRIKANT D.KULKARNI
State of Maharashtra, Through its District Collector – Appellant
Versus
Bhimdeo s/o Rattu Rathod – Respondent

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Mr. B. V. Virdhe, AGP
For the Respondent:Mr. Vikas G. Kodale, h/f Mr. V. D. Gunale, Advocate

JUDGMENT :

The State has preferred these two appeals feeling aggrieved by the common impugned judgment and award passed by the Reference Court in LAR No.05 of 2013 and LAR No.06 of 2013 under Section 18 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (hereinafter referred to as the “said Act” for the sake of convenience). Both appeals can be disposed of by common judgment.

2. The following factual scenario would cover the dispute in narrow compass:

(1)

Name of the Village

Kolwadi Tanda, Taluka Kannad, District Aurangabad

(2)

Gat Number	Acquired Area
301	1 H 56 R
301	1 H 98 R
301	2 H 00 R

(3)

Date of Notification U/s. 4 of L.A. Act published in Mah. Gov. Gazette

Date: 31-7-1995

(4)

Date of Notice U/s.4 of L.A. Act received by the claimants.

Date: 02-4-1998

(5)

Date of possession of the land taken by the Ex. Engg. by private negotiation

Date: 09-4-1996

(6)

Date of Award U/sec. 11

Date 25-7-2000

(7)

Date on which Notice of the award u/s. 12(2) received by the claimants.

Date: 22-1-2001

(8)

Date of payment of compens

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

2022 Supreme(Bom) 537

SHRIKANT D.KULKARNIState of Maharashtra, Through its District Collector – AppellantVersusBhimdeo s/o Rattu Rathod – Respondent

Cases Referred (9)

SHRIKANT D.KULKARNI
State of Maharashtra, Through its District Collector – Appellant
Versus
Bhimdeo s/o Rattu Rathod – Respondent