A.A.SAYED, ABHAY AHUJA
Abhijit Ganpat Samant – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
A.A. SAYED, J.
1. The Petitioners, who are Councillors of Mumbai Municipal Corporation, have questioned the Constitutional validity of the Ordinance No. XIII of 2021 dated 30 November 2021. By the impugned Ordinance, section 5(1)(a) of the Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888, is amended by increasing the number of directly elected Municipal Councillors from 227 to 236.
2. Section 5 of the Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1988, provides for the composition of the Mumbai Municipal Corporation (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Corporation’). Section 5(1)(a) reads thus:
(a) two hundred and twenty seven Councillors directly elected at Ward elections.”
3. Census is taken every ten years under the Census Act, 1948 and Census Rules, 1990. The case of the Petitioners is as under:
(ii) In the next Census i.e. 2001 Census, the population of Mumbai was recorded as 1,19,78,450. Due to the increase in population
Dr. K. Krishna Murthy and Others vs. Union of India and Another
Gurudevdatta VKSSS Maryadit and Others vs. State of Maharashtra
Indian Express Newspapers (Bombay) (P) Ltd. vs. Union of India
Shayara Bano vs. Union of India
State of Bihar and Others vs. Bihar Distillery Ltd. and Others
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.