K.R.SHRIRAM, R.N.LADDHA
Yashoda Shivappa Nagangoudar – Appellant
Versus
Income Tax Officer, Mumbai – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
K.R. SHRIRAM, J.
1. Petitioner received a notice dated 16th March, 2019 under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the Act) for A.Y. 2012-13. According to respondents they had reasons to believe that petitioner’s income chargeable to tax for A.Y. 2012-13 has escaped assessment. The reasons for re-opening is annexed to the petition. The reasons indicate that respondents have information that petitioner has deposited Rs. 13,40,000/- in cash during F.Y. 2011-12. Notwithstanding that petitioner has not filed return of income for A.Y. 2012-13. Therefore, the income chargeable to tax amounting to Rs. 13,40,000/- has escaped assessment due to failure on the part of the petitioner to disclose fully and truly all material facts for his assessment.
2. Petitioner filed objections dated 10th October, 2019 to the reopening of assessment. In that petitioner has explained as under:
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.