K.R.SHRIRAM, N.J.JAMADAR
Pavan Morarka – Appellant
Versus
Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax – 2(3) – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
K.R. SHRIRAM, J.
1. Since identical issues are involved in both petitions, facts from Writ Petition No.602 of 2014 in the case of Mr. Pavan Murarka (petitioner) are referred to hereunder :
Petitioner held 50% of the equity share capital of Shivum Holdings Pvt. Ltd. (Shivum) and 25% of the equity share capital of P & A Estate Pvt. Ltd. (P&A). Petitioner’s wife, Rachana Murarka (RM), petitioner in Writ Petition No.2145 of 2014, held 50% of the equity share capital of Shivum and 25% of the equity share capital of P&A. Balance 50% of the equity share capital of P&A was held by Mr. Akshat Prasad. Shivum held 85% interest in a partnership firm named Laxmi Trading Company (LTC) and petitioner held the balance 15% interest in LTC. During the previous year relevant to the assessment year 2006-2007, LTC gave an advance of Rs.1,25,00,000/- to P&A on behalf of Shivum. The accumulated profits of Shivum as on 31st March 2006 were Rs.3,38,53,410/-.
2. On 29th July 2006 petitioner filed return of income for Assessment Year 2006-2007. An assessment order dated 25th November 2008 came to be passed under Section 143(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the said Act). In the meanwhile, an assessment
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.