JUDGMENT :

1. Heard.

2. Admit.

3. In this appeal filed under Section 372 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, a challenge is raised to the judgment and order passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Washim in Sessions Trial No.27/2016 dated 23/05/2019 acquitting the accused Nos.1 and 2/respondent Nos.2 and 3 for the offence punishable under Section 306 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

4. It is the case of the prosecution in brief that on 10/03/2015, one Sandip Vitthal Chaudhari committed suicide by jumping into the well. One Shankar Rambhau Chaudhari-PW-1, who is the uncle of the deceased lodged a report about accidental death and hence, Marg No.10/2015 was registered under Section 174 of the Criminal Procedure Code.

5. While doing inquest panchanama, a suicide note was found in a plastic pouch in the pocket of trouser of the deceased Sandip. In the suicide note, accused Nos.1 and 2 were blamed for the suicide. It was stated in the suicide note that the deceased was being harassed by the accused.

6. Thereupon, on 13/05/2015, the report was lodged by Vitthal Rambhau Chaudhari, blaming accused Nos.1 and 2 for suicide of deceased Sandip.

7. Accordingly, Crime No.40/2015 c