JUDGMENT :

1. Heard Mr. U.R. Timble, learned Counsel for the appellant, Mr. A.D. Bhobe, learned Counsel for respondent nos.1 to 5 and Mr. S. Sayed, learned Counsel for respondent no.6.

2. Admittedly, in this case, no leave was obtained under Section 170 of the MV Act. Therefore, the appeal questioning the quantum of compensation awarded in the impugned award will not be maintainable having regard to the law laid down by the Division Bench of this Court in I.C.I.C.I. Lombard General Insurance Co. Ltd., Amravati V/s. Surekha w/o. Prakash Ghurde and ors.. (2020) 2 Bom.CR 465.

3. Mr. Timble, however, submitted that the driver of the offending vehicle did not possess a valid driving license on the date of the accident and this would amount to breach of the terms of the insurance policy. He submitted that such a point can always be pressed by the Insurance Company by instituting an appeal.

4. If the pleadings on record on behalf of the Insurance Company are perused, no such defence appears to have been raised. In any case, there is no evidence in support of such defence. The onus of raising and making good such defence would be on the Insurance Company. In the absence of all this, the impugn