JUDGMENT :

Ravindra V. Ghuge, J.-

1. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith and heard finally by the consent of the parties.

2. By this petition, the petitioner, who is rendered a widow at a young age, has rushed to this Court by putting forth prayer clause ‘C’.

“C. By appropriate writ order or direction the impugned order dated 18-12-2017 passed by the Respondent No. 02 thereby refusing to accord the approval to the petitioner for the appointment on the post of Peon on compassionate ground may kindly be quashed and set aside.”

3. In the second petition, the petitioner, who is the son of a deceased employee, has also approached this Court by putting forth prayer clauses ‘B, C and D’.

“B. By issue of Writ of mandamus or Order or direction in the like nature, the impugned order dated 10-12-2019 passed by the Respondent No. 2 Education Officer (Secondary) Zilla Parishad Nanded whereby rejecting the approval of the Petitioner, may kindly be quashed and set-aside.”

“C. By issue of Writ of mandamus or Order or direction in the like nature, the Respondent No. 2 Education Officer (Secondary) Zilla Parishad Nanded may kindly be directed to grant approval to the post of peon to the Petition