SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Bom) 1688

IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY
Ravindra V. Ghuge, S.G. Mehare, JJ.
VIDHAYAK SAMITI PIMPALNER’S LATE N.S. PATIL SECONDARY AND HIGHER SECONDARY SCHOOL – Petitioner
Vs.
STATE OF MAHARASHTRA – Respondent
W.P. No. 6459 of 2020
Decided On : 22-09-2021

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioners: V.D. Hon, A.V. Hon.
For the Respondents: S.R. Yadav, S.S. Deshmukh.

A person who has voluntarily resigned from the position of Head Master cannot subsequently claim the position at the expense of the incumbent Head Master, unless the resignation is challenged and proven to be forceful.

Headnote:

resignation - appointment of Head Master - MEPS Rules, 1981 - Rule 3

Fact of the Case:

The petition concerns the appointment of a Head Master in an Educational Institution, where the senior most teacher had resigned and subsequently declined to be reappointed as the Head Master. The dispute arose when another teacher was appointed as the Head Master, leading to a legal challenge.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the resignation of the senior most teacher as the Head Master was voluntary and final, and thus, he could not subsequently claim the position at the expense of the incumbent Head Master. The court dismissed the petition and upheld the appointment of the current Head Master.

Issues: The issues revolved around the eligibility of a teacher to reclaim the position of Head Master after voluntarily resigning and subsequently declining the position, and the validity of the appointment of the current Head Master.

Ratio Decidendi: The court held that a person who has voluntarily resigned from the position of Head Master cannot later claim the position at the cost of the incumbent Head Master, unless the resignation is proven to be forceful and is quashed and set aside.

Final Decision: The petition was dismissed, and the appointment of the current Head Master was upheld.

JUDGMENT :

Ravindra V. Ghuge, J.

1. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith and heard finally by the consent of the parties

2. The issue that falls for our consideration in this petition is as to:

    (a) whether a teacher who has resigned as the Head Master, can again rise and put forth a claim that he again desires to become the Head Master.

(b) whether such a teacher can be permitted to reclaim the position of a Head Master once he has resigned?

3. This petition has been filed by petitioner No. 1, an Educational Institution, through it’s secretary and petitioner No. 2, a teacher at Sr. No. 3 in the seniority list, prior to the retirement of the senior teachers Shri. K.B. Bhamre on 31-5-2019 and Shri. P.A. Bhat on 30-9-2020.

4. The petitioner has put forth prayer clause “B” and ‘C” ass under:

    “(B) Issue a writ of certiorari or writ in the nature of certiorari to quash and set aside the order dated 19-8-2020 passed by the respondent No. 2 the Deputy Director of Education, Nashik Division, Nashik.

(C) Issue a writ of mandamus or writ in the nature of mandamus to the respondent Nos. 2 and 3 the Deputy Director of Education, Nashik Division, Nashik and the Education Officer (Secondary), Zilla Parishad, Dhule, respectively, to consider the proposal submitted by petitioner No. 1 for appointment of petitioner No. 2 Harendrakumar Pandharinath Shete, senior most teacher as regular Head Master of the School viz. N.S. Patil Secondary and Higher Secondary School, Pimpalner, Tq. Sakri, Dist. Dhule.”

5. We have considered the strenuous submissions of the learned Sr. Advocate on behalf of the petitioners, the learned AGP on behalf of respondent Nos. 1 to 3 and Shri. Deshmukh, learned Advocate on behalf of respondent No. 4.

6. The facts of the case are that respondent No. 4 was before this Court in WP No. 4999/2019 making a grievance that he should be appointed as a Head Master as Shri Bhamre (S. No. 1) and Shri Sawle (Sr.No. 2) had retired, Shri Bhat (Sr.No. 3) was not interested in becoming the Head Master and Shri Shete, petitioner No. 2 herein, had resigned as the Head Master. This Court, vide order dated 20-8-2019, directed the Educational Institution to submit a proposal of the senior most teacher, apart from those who have declined to work as Head Master, to the Education Officer for a decision.

7. Pursuant to the above directions, the Education Officer considered the prevailing fact situation of Shri Bhamre having superannuated, Shri Bhat having declined and Shri Shete having resigned as Head Master and then proceeded to appoint respondent No. 4 Shri B. L. Chavan, who was then an immediate senior candidate eligible to be appointed as Head Master. However, the approval granted to Mr. Chavan was suddenly cancelled vide order dated 16-10-2019 passed by the same Education Officer who, in turn, granted approval to officiate as Incharge Head Master to Mr. Umesh Jayram Patil, who was down below at S. No. 6 in the seniority list for the year 2019-2020.

8. Shri Chavan, therefore, approached this Court in WP No. 110/2020 raising a grievance that he could not have been dislodged, in as much as, there is another teacher namely Mr. M. Y.Thingle below him and Shri Umesh Patil was even junior to Mr. Thingle. This Court, by order dated 9-3-2020, quashed the impugned order of the Education Officer and considering the role played by the Education Officer, directed the Deputy Director of Education to consider the whole issue and pass a fresh order.

9. As the Deputy Director of Education/respondent No. 4 herein delivered an order dated 19-8-2021 approving the appointment of Mr. Chavan as the Head Master, this petition has been preferred by the petitioners.

10. For clarity, we are recording the seniority list, as it was at the relevant time in A.Y. 2019-2020 as under:

    1. Shri Bhamare Kishor Bhalchandra- Head Master (superannuated on 31-5-2019).

2. Shri Bhat Pramod Anant - Declined to be Head Master (superannuated on 30-9-2020).

3. Shri Shete Harendrakumar Pandharinath (petition

      Click Here to Read the rest of this document
      1
      2
      3
      4
      5
      6
      7
      8
      9
      10
      11
      SupremeToday Portrait Ad
      supreme today icon
      logo-black

      An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

      Please visit our Training & Support
      Center or Contact Us for assistance

      qr

      Scan Me!

      India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

      For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

      whatsapp-icon Back to top