MANISH PITALE
RAJESH S/O HIMMATLAL DAWDA – Appellant
Versus
NARESH S/O GYARSILAL AGRAWAL – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Manish Pitale, J.
1. Heard.
2. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith. Heard finally with the consent of the learned counsel for the rival parties.
3. By this writ petition, the petitioner has challenged order dated 24-2-2021, passed by the Court of Small Causes, Nagpur, on an application filed on behalf of the respondent (landlord) for fixation of interim fair/standard rent of the tenanted premises. The said application has been partly allowed and the petitioner (tenant) has been directed to pay interim fair/standard rent of the suit plot at Rs. 15,000/- per month from the date of filing of the application.
4. The respondent filed an application under section 8 of the Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999 (in short “Act of 1999”) for fixation of fair/standard rent. During the pendency of the said application, the respondent filed the aforesaid application for fixation of interim fair/standard rent for the tenanted premises. The application stood partly allowed, as noted above.
5. The petitioner being aggrieved by the said order filed the present writ petition, wherein notice was issued for final disposal and effect of the impugned order was stayed, subject to the petitioner making
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.