R.D.DHANUKA, S.G.MEHARE
Miss Madhu – Appellant
Versus
State Of Maharashtra – Respondent
JUDGMENT
S.G.MEHARE, J. - Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith. By consent of the parties heard finally at the admission stage.
2. The caste claim of the petitioner belonging to Mannervarlu Scheduled Tribe is invalidated by the impugned order dtd. 30/6/2018.
3. The learned counsel for the petitioner would argue that rejection of the caste claim of the petitioner without holding the caste claim of near relative obtained by playing fraud cannot be invalidated. There was no evidence before the scrutiny committee that the word 'lu' was added at the last of the caste by the petitioner herself. There was absolutely no evidence before the vigilance cell that certificate dtd. 17/5/1972 was forge. The vigilance cell did not record the statement of the president of the municipality to find out the genuineness of the certificate dtd. 17/5/1972. In the absence of adding the word 'lu' to the caste would not lead to an irresistible conclusion that the said word was added by the petitioner. There was no evidence of handwriting expert before the caste scrutiny committee to prove that the word 'lu' was subsequently added. The school entry of the real uncle of the petitioner namely Mohan Gangadhar Bi
Anand vs. Committee For Scrutiny and Verification of Tribe Claims
Apoorva Vinay Nichale vs. Divisional Caste Certificate Committee No.1
Chitra vs. District Collector and Chairman State Level Vigilance Committee, Tamil Nadu
Mahesh Pralhadrao Lad vs. State of Maharashtra
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.