AVINASH G.GHAROTE
Suraj @ Surya Dinesh Malviya – Appellant
Versus
State Of Maharashtra – Respondent
JUDGMENT
AVINASH G.GHAROTE, J. - Heard Mr. Bhangde, learned counsel for the applicant and Mr. Damle, learned APP for the non-applicant/State.
2. The applicant has been arraigned for the offence punishable under Ss. 20, 29 and 27-A of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (for short "the NDPS Act") in Crime No.307 of 2020.
The incident is dtd. 21/7/2020. The applicant has been arrested on 4/3/2021. The charge-sheet has been filed on 18/8/2021.
3. Mr. Bhangde, learned counsel for the applicant submits, that merely on the basis of suspicion, on the statement of one Kanhaiyya Dhurve, who claims, that at the instance of the applicant, he had transferred a sum of Rs.5,000.00 in the account of the accused No.1 Sheikh Ansar Sheikh Israil, the applicant has been made an accused in the present matter. The other instance is the statement under Sec. 27 of the Indian Evidence Act of the above accused No.1, which states, that he had received Rs.10,000.00 from the applicant in cash for purchase of Ganja. He submits, that the statement of the accused No.1, who is the co-accused in the matter, is inadmissible and cannot be used against the applicant. He further submits, that the p
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.