SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Bom) 1267

C.V.BHADANG
Rutwik Vijay Sonawane – Appellant
Versus
State Of Maharashtra – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Satyavrat Joshi, Advocate, Nitesh Mohite, Advocate, Y.Y.Dabke, Advocate

JUDGMENT

1. By this application, the Applicant-accused No. 5 is seeking bail. The Applicant along with co-accused has been chargesheeted in MCOC Case No. 689 of 2020 arising out of Crime No. 201 of 2020 registered with Police Station Haveli, District Pune, for the offence punishable under Sec. 307, 385, 384, 143, 147, 148, 149, 506 of IPC and Sec. 3 and 25 of the Arms Act.

2. The aforesaid crime is registered on the basis of the complaint lodged by Raju Sonawane on 18/5/2020. According to the first informant on 17/5/2020 at about 8.30 p.m., when he along with his family members and his friend Nikhil alias Khandu Chavan were at his house, three unidentified persons in the age group of 25 to 30 years came there. One of those persons handed over the phone to the informant saying that it is a call from "Bhai". On taking the call, the informant noticed that it was one Chetan Limhan alias Mama (who according to the prosecution is the gang leader). Chetan Limhan accosted the informant, as to why he has not sent money and made a demand of Rs.50,000.00, failing which threatening the informant to be killed. The informant told about the incident to his brother Rambhau Sonawane, who is his neig

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top