SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Bom) 1135

NITIN B.SURYAWANSHI
Bansi – Appellant
Versus
Yeshwanta – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
V. J. Dixit, Advocate, Sushant V. Dixit, Advocate, Ganesh V. Sukale, Advocate, B. S. Choure, Advocate

JUDGMENT

Nitin B. Suryawanshi, J. - Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith. Heard finally with the consent of learned advocates for the appearing parties.

2. The challenge raised in this writ petition is to the order dated 19. 01.2009 passed by the Deputy Collector, Land Reforms, Beed and confirmed by Maharashtra Revenue Tribunal, aurangabad.

3. The property in question is land Survey No. 40/a admeasuring 2 Hector 83 R. situated at village Dongaon, Taluka Kaij, District Beed. One Gangabhishan Shrikishan Ranwa was the original owner of land Survey No. 40 admeasuring 17 acres 12 Gunthas. The said Survey number was divided in five plots, Survey Nos. 40/a, 40/4, 40/5, 40/7 and 40/8. On 23-06-1969, Gangabhishan initiated proceedings against Yashwant, respondent No.1 for recovery of rent and possession of an area of 15 acre 35 Gunthas from land Survey No. 40/a and 7 acre 27 Gunthas from Survey No.37. In the said proceedings, a compromise was recorded between landlord Gangabhishan and tenant Yashwant, whereby it was mutually agreed that Yashwanta the tenant shall retain 7 acres of agricultural property from land Survey No. 40/a and release 8 acre 35 Gunthas of Survey No. 40 and 7 acre 27 Gunth

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top